Each case reflects real work across different industries, with a focus on identifying problems, restructuring strategy, and improving performance.
Client names are not publicly shared unless permission has been given.
Headline
How a Venture Capital Firm Recovered 52% Pipeline Growth in a Portfolio Company in Two Quarters
Client Type
Boston-area venture capital firm, portfolio company in the B2B SaaS space, $12M ARR at engagement start.
Results (above the fold)
• 52% improvement in marketing-attributed pipeline within two quarters
• 34% increase in lead-to-opportunity conversion
• 27% reduction in inefficient ad spend
The Situation
The VC firm reached out because one of their portfolio companies had been investing consistently in marketing — a substantial monthly retainer with an external agency plus paid media spend — but leadership had no clear visibility into what was driving results. The company was growing, but the growth felt random rather than engineered. Without an internal marketing leader, the agency's monthly reports were being accepted at face value by a founder whose expertise was elsewhere.
What Leadership Thought the Problem Was
The assumption going in was that performance could probably be better, and the cause was either execution quality at the agency or tougher market conditions. In other words — "turn the crank harder." The real diagnosis was structural, not tactical.
What the Audit Actually Found
A full audit of the previous quarter across paid media, reporting, website conversion, and funnel analytics revealed something different. The agency had drifted into maintenance mode. Campaigns were running, but none had been meaningfully optimized in months. Reports emphasized impressions and click-through rates rather than pipeline, cost per qualified lead, or customer acquisition cost. Budget was flowing without a clear connection to revenue.
The deeper issue was an accountability vacuum. Without a Head of Marketing or internal marketing owner, nobody was asking the right questions, challenging agency performance, or tying strategy back to business outcomes. The agency wasn't malicious — they simply had no counterpart who knew what good looked like.
What Was Implemented
Lina stepped in as interim CMO for two quarters. The first 30 days focused on resetting expectations with the agency — redefining success around pipeline and revenue metrics rather than activity volume. The marketing strategy was rebuilt around lead quality, conversion, and ICP alignment rather than top-of-funnel volume.
In parallel, the right internal team structure was defined. Lina participated in the hiring process and helped select a permanent Head of Marketing to own ongoing execution. Agency contracts were restructured with performance accountability built in. Reporting was rebuilt from scratch to surface what the CEO and board actually needed to see.
Ongoing Partnership
The engagement transitioned to a quarterly oversight model. Lina continues to meet with the VC firm and the portfolio company each quarter to review performance, pressure-test strategy, and adjust. The work now is less about rebuilding and more about making sure marketing stays in continuous improvement rather than drifting back into maintenance mode.
Why This Matters to You
If your marketing is running but you can't clearly articulate what's driving pipeline — or if you're a PE firm or VC with portfolio companies whose marketing performance is opaque — this is the pattern. The fix is almost never "try harder." It's accountability, reporting, and the right person asking the right questions.
Headline
84% Inquiry Growth and 31% Enrollment Lift for a Private Catholic School's Middle School Program
Client Type
K–8 private Catholic school in the Greater Boston area, roughly 350 students at engagement start.
Results
• 84% increase in qualified middle school inquiries
• 49% increase in tour-to-application conversion
• 31% increase in middle school enrollment year-over-year
The Situation
The school had a classic private school enrollment problem: strong early-grades enrollment, declining middle school numbers. Families were choosing the school for kindergarten and early elementary, then quietly transferring elsewhere before 6th grade. Families were still touring the middle school program — interest was there — but a meaningful share chose to leave at the transition point.
What Was Actually Happening
The audit revealed that the school's marketing treated K–8 as a single narrative. Middle school was an extension of the elementary experience rather than a distinct, deliberately-chosen phase with its own value proposition. At the exact moment parents were reconsidering — comparing the school against competitors offering more rigorous academics, stronger athletics, or different community cultures — the school's messaging gave them nothing specific to reconsider.
The tour experience had the same problem. Families toured a school; they didn't tour a middle school. Follow-up after the tour was generic. The school was losing families not because it lacked the goods, but because it never made the case for what the goods actually were at the middle school level.
What Was Implemented
1. Repositioned middle school as a distinct phase with its own branding, photography, and messaging
2. Built a dedicated middle school funnel: landing page, targeted paid media, specific content
3. Rebuilt the tour experience: middle school–specific tour, led by middle school staff and current students
4. Implemented structured follow-up sequences after every tour, with content tailored to parents' specific questions and concerns
5. Trained admissions staff on middle school–specific objection handling
The Lesson
For private and Catholic schools fighting middle school attrition, this is almost always the pattern. The school is fine. The marketing is treating a distinct decision point as continuation. Breaking that out — giving parents something specific to choose into, rather than choose to stay — is usually the single highest-leverage shift available.
Advisors were overwhelmed with leads that were not converting, and growth had stalled.
Positioning was too broad and the digital experience did not reflect the level of client they wanted to attract.
Refined positioning, restructured the website, shifted paid media strategy, and improved CRM workflows.
Headline
How a CPA Firm Built an AI Marketing System That Delivered 117% More Inbound Inquiries
Client Type
Mid-sized CPA firm, ~25 professionals, serving small businesses and high-net-worth individuals.
Results
• 117% increase in inbound inquiries
• 63% improvement in response and follow-up efficiency
• 42% increase in consultation bookings
The Situation
The firm's marketing output was entirely dependent on partner availability. During January through April — tax season — marketing effectively stopped. During summer, it restarted inconsistently. The firm knew this was a problem, but the solution everyone kept suggesting was "hire someone full-time" — which none of the partners actually wanted to own as a management responsibility.
What Was Actually Happening
There was no system. Content production depended on whoever had time to write something. Lead follow-up was manual and inconsistent. Marketing metrics weren't being tracked because nobody owned them. The problem wasn't the people — it was that every piece of marketing depended on someone remembering to do it during a week when they weren't slammed.
What Was Implemented
1. Built an AI-driven content engine: automated first drafts of blog posts, email newsletters, and social content tailored to the firm's voice and audience
2. Implemented intelligent lead capture: every form submission triggered AI-generated, personalized follow-up within 10 minutes
3. Automated email workflows: tax planning nurture, business owner nurture, year-end planning sequences
4. AI-enhanced lead scoring: inbound inquiries automatically routed to the right partner based on scope
5. Full handoff with documentation: the firm now operates the system with a part-time marketing coordinator, not a full-time hire
The Lesson
For professional service firms where marketing depends on billable people's available time, the answer is almost never "hire someone full-time." It's "build a system that doesn't need someone's constant attention." AI makes that substantially more achievable than it was even two years ago.
The practice wanted a more predictable flow of new patients.
Visitors were not converting. Messaging and trust signals were weak and booking was not clear.
Redesigned the website, improved booking flow, launched paid search, and strengthened social proof.
Patient flow was inconsistent and heavily reliant on referrals.
Local visibility was inconsistent and follow up with past patients was limited.
Improved local search visibility, built targeted campaigns, and implemented follow up systems.
Growth was inconsistent and heavily referral based.
There was no clear positioning or system for managing leads.
Built a structured marketing system including positioning, website improvements, and CRM integration.
Marketing was inconsistent across locations and revenue opportunities were being missed.
Each location operated independently with no shared strategy.
Centralized strategy, aligned branding, and introduced coordinated campaigns across locations.
Stay updated on our news and events! Sign up to receive periodic email communications and case studies. Don't worry- we won't flood your inbox and we will only send relevant information. You can opt out at any time.